Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Search results

  1. Goldstone1976

    [Football] Raheem Sterling has an AK 47 tattoo on his thigh. Should he play for England?

    Yep, they would. What’s the reason? Perhaps, some combination of unreasonable expectations of success from the press and the public, together with many players not really caring that much (with some notable exceptions - eg Beckham would have always pulled on the shirt with pride and intent)?
  2. Goldstone1976

    [Football] Raheem Sterling has an AK 47 tattoo on his thigh. Should he play for England?

    Haven’t you just proved my point, at least with regards to Kane? I didn’t say that our strikers aren’t capable of turning in world-class performances, I specifically said they’re shit on the World stage. Kane v Iceland is a brilliant example.
  3. Goldstone1976

    [Football] Raheem Sterling has an AK 47 tattoo on his thigh. Should he play for England?

    Makes absolutely no difference. On the World stage, all our strikers are shit.
  4. Goldstone1976

    [Football] Raheem Sterling has an AK 47 tattoo on his thigh. Should he play for England?

    Wanna have a guess at at how many he’ll score in the WC? I’ll go for zero.
  5. Goldstone1976

    [Football] Raheem Sterling has an AK 47 tattoo on his thigh. Should he play for England?

    No, no he shouldn’t. But that’s because he’s shit, not because he’s chosen a particularly chavvy tat.

Top
Link Here