Search results

Along with three others. Apparently.

Petrosinella, Petrosinella, let down your hair...

3.6 weeks' gross wages, assuming no bonuses/appearance fees.

Thanks. So, given it seems the bench sentenced for a Cat 1 offence, the 56 day ban could possibly be increased (since he was given 9 points and not 6)? But to nowhere near the 6 month ban he’ll now get if he gets another 3 points. Your sword of Damacles assessment of the sentencing seems...

Thanks. In your opinion, for 110 in a 70, would a 9 or 12 month ban be disproportionate?

I don’t know about Shane, but I’d be telling Knocky to pull it down a bit, it’s all ruffled up.

Ah! That’d explain it!

You sound like you know what you’re talking about on this subject! You say there’s no statutory minimum for a Cat 1 offence, so he could have got a 28 day ban, which, in your (logical, imo) opinion is less effective than a “sword of Damacles”. What’s the maximum ban they could have imposed...

Hang on - I was under the impression that anything greater than 30mph over the speed limit was an insta-ban. 110mph - hmmm. Beak an Albion fan? Hush my mouth.

Knocky, “impatient and arrogant”? Shurely shome mishtake?