No and I have no idea if any was. I blew into the gadget and got a green light. That's all I recall. I stress I'd not had very many at all and felt absolutely fine. I had no doubt I was safe to drive, but wasn't sure what the breathalyzer may say.
I'm not sure that lowering the current limit is the way forward or not. However, if I did, my reason would not be dangerous driving from the "I can have one can't I?" crowd, and the like, who stay below the current limit.
My reason would be that having a limit that does seem to allow "I can...
Without Googling, I'm pretty sure it's 20-something, yes.
If I know I'm driving I won't even "I can only have one because I have to drive" and I'm incredibly paranoid about day after driving too, having been involved in an accident on a Sunday morning after a Saturday night out. I hadn't had...
It wouldn't of course, but you seemed to be stating the case for a 0% limit. Therefore any detectable alcohol in the bloodstream would lead to a conviction being pursued, whether that's come from Christmas cake, medicine (some medicines are as strong as 12.5%) or whatever.
I think part of the problem is that it strikes me that people think the risk of drink driving is getting caught not killing others and/or themselves.
"I can't drive - I might get caught" rather than "I can't drive - I might kill someone".
It's because of this that, presumably, the "Don't drink...