That is your opinion, it is not a matter of fact. I maintain - it's simple maths: if your total number of parliamentary seats gives you the balance of power you are not an irrelevance.
As for Clegg and Cable - when you are in coalition there are compromises. The Lib Dems should not have...
An irrelevance that still has more seats in Parliament than the DUP? A party decimated yet still large enough numerically to hold the balance of power?
You're missing my point, and I'm not a Labour supporter. This is about alienating large parts of the electorate and the effect it might have on the Tory Party longterm.
There's nothing healthy about being on a hefty mortgage and seeing your monthly payments rising. High rents, student loan repayments - this starts to impact on the parents of the young too. Where is the next Tory majority going to come from?
As the OP I don't understand why you find the title of the thread tiresome. Politically, May took a comfortable majority and made it disappear. Things get harder for the young year or year - interest rates have risen, no real clarity or progress on Brexit. She took a lot for granted in the GE...
As the OP I was making the point about a COMBINATION of Tory policies discriminating against the young and what effect that might have in the long-term.
I don't recall a time when the Tories had so little to offer the younger voter. It just feels as though there is a huge political vacuum...
I see Theresa May's university review will not scrap tuition fees and she's pledged to keep the £9,250 cap.
Given Labour have said they'll abolish tuition fees, given the young were overruled on Brexit and it is now almost impossible for them to get on the housing ladder aren't the Tories not...