Search results

You said it was harmless. I was only coming back to that. I've even said above it wouldn't be a legislative priority for me. Still none the wiser, even with the definition. Why do you need to express sexual attraction to someone in public?

To you, maybe. To a survivor of sexual assault, maybe not. Normally this 'idiots spoiling it for the majority' argument involves there being some form of benefit to the thing. I don't really understand the benefit of wolf-whistling.

I don't think I've heard one for some time (no surprise there - right?) It certainly wouldn't be top of my legislative agenda.

I love the pretence that a wolf whistle has ever been about anything other than making women feel uncomfortable. It's a shame evolution hasn't got rid of it already.