Only the posters who are against the idea are saying 'players won't be rested' (and the :fishing: OP).
To me it's not a case of what's happened before it's all about planning for the future, if you think Murray is up to playing 3 games in 8 days, that's great, CH may well think the same and...
Oh definitely :bounce: away, I have no problem with being wrong.
I'd be ecstatic with 0-0, a point against the head and all that, I'd also be very surprised.
I seem to remember we've been here before though with the end result you being a little disappointed by the manner of the defeat at...
You'd have to be a bit special to think CH would play the same XI that started v Stoke at Utd, with palace just 3 days later.
Hemed for Murray, Solly for a winger, Suttner for Bong are all perfectly 'normal' replacements with the more important (irrespective of rivalry) palace game in mind.
Who...
That is true, and far be it for me to second guess the Messiah, but the performance at Arsenal was in stark contrast to the performance v West Ham, and very reminiscent of the style used v City.
I'm expecting this to be another 'don't lose badly' performance, which will hopefully come on the...
Whereas life long Utd fan would crawl over broken glass to play and score at Old Trafford.
Keeping GM fresh enough to do much the same 72 hours later.
Now if GM scores a couple off his arse v Stoke, would that swap still be playing a 'weakened' team?
I'm kicking myself for not writing...
That saves me from writing!
I know the OP is :fishing: but with all the evidence so far CH has no intention of playing to win at Old Trafford, which this time is fair enough, so it's not like we'll be losing points anyway.
Because of their respective league positions Stoke and palace are far...