Search results

Me too. I'd be thinking "thanks for noticing that Sky". Because at full pace Yedlin doesn't react, their fans don't react and the FSW doesn't react either. I'm in the WSU & had an excellent view & didn't even notice. Even Bozza who I've disagreed with on this didn't notice till he got back to...

I still believe it was unintentional and that the FA's hand has been forced, not by Newcastle, but by a TV company needing to justify its own existence. That said, now he's charged we need to take it on the chin as we can't afford to lose Tomer for an extra game. Proves two things; firstly...

When does he have to be charged by? What if the ref mentions it in his report & says words to the effect of accidental, nothing to it etc? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

People saying it's a ban should look at the highlights thread with its different angle and commentary. This is Sky creating a controversy Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I've played plenty of games and you don't go up on tiptoe like that for any reason other than to avoid someone. The opportunity is there for a sly kick and Hemed doesn't take it. He then loses balance and puts his foot in a tangle of limbs before getting straight off. As others have said...

He's on tip toes with the guy flat out in front of him. One tiny shift in his centre of gravity and his feet have to go somewhere. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Back on track that's not deliberate in a million years, Hemed's off balance & gets tangled up with him. Foot comes down instinctively. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk