Search results

Totally disagree, but that's football! We had to be pragmatic. Like it or not, they are far superior to us so the tactics we employed were, in my opinion, the only ones we could have employed to avoid a thrashing. Anything else would have left City with so much space to stroll around at...

He was bought to play? Surely not!

No - that's why I said "I'm not sure .." My main point was that, if it were an error, you can criticise it, but you can't criticise it on the basis of a guess of what might have followed.

What contrived reasoning to justify your criticism. If he'd saved it, the rest of the game from that moment on would have been completely different to what actually happened, and City might have gone on to score three more! I'm not sure it was an error anyway.