Search results

Unlike cricket fans where pretty much everyone knows the moon landings were faked.

There have been studies by the University of Cambridge and others such as calculating the mass of each floor plate, modelled progressive collapse, data on the floor tie couplings, calculations on the likely intensity of the fires, burn rates, structural stability, and all the other factors, not...

It is absolutely fitting you just refer to other videos, not any scientific papers, journals, real study on the subject.

This is why you're treated with such disdain. As if something as complex, scientific, enormous as what happened on 9/11 could be satisfactorily answered by a YouTube video. All the evidence is not there, not by a long chalk, not unless your threshold for proof is so low it makes Trump look like...

A good conspirator will only ever answer with a question.

Of course there were explosions, think of all the utilities, services, facilities, even fire extinguishers that would have been exploding. Even structural failures like concrete under tension can make an incredible bang that sounds like an explosion.

You've seriously not researched the background, current employment, credentials of these people? Honestly, some have become more wealthy through conspiracy than they ever made as engineers. Some aren't even qualified engineers!

I think they've made a career decision on what is financially best to set them up for retirement.

You know how much these relatively cheap videos earn on YouTube, Amazon Prime, Netflix etc. how much the experts earn from their appearance and books? Why don't you post something from an Engineering Journal, or properly researched study like Dr Keith Seffen did at the University of Cambridge...

Firstly, Hillsborough was a cover up of incompetence, not conspiracy or intent. What you are suggesting with 9/11 is planned intent, knowing destruction, a conscious conspiracy. Secondly, American history should play an important role in your research. No other nation has such a hunger for...

They got lessons, booked time on simulators - fact. Have you really only watched a couple of conspiracy videos for all your knowledge on this!?

Well said. The outer skin forming a structural purpose was pretty much reduced by 25% across 3 or 4 floors, just by the impact of the plane. Most fire protection resists fire, not a plan crash so plasterboard, linings etc. completely and instantaneously stripped by the impact. Then you add a...

They make a bit of cash on these things you know. Most of them aren't even practicing engineers when you do a bit of digging, which I'm sure you've done...

No, what they did was progressive collapse which has happened in other situations. The towers were quite complex structurally, given the failures through the impact of the aircraft coupled with the fires, the type of collapse was what an engineer might predict.

No building had had a passenger jet crash into it at high speed pretty much stripping multiple floors of all their fire linings, fire breaks and fire retardant coatings.

There's a few on Amazon Prime. To get sucked into these documentaries, well you really are open to anything, and would be a dream audience member at a Tony Lomezma hyponsis evening done the local social club.