Search results

top rebutting. :jester:

you didnt really offer much to debate, just an idea that not been accepted as sensible or logical. i was going to go on to say thats only ~500k for a CEO of a company thats workforce reflected the national average, with consequences for companies that have workforce earning below the average in...

so just drawing on a decades old idea, that the world has ignored.

what gap is sufficiently narrow enough for you then?

curious what market you think is being distorted by a CEO getting paid more than someone on the "shop floor". and since its a football forum, why is the focus on CEO/worker pay when we have some of the starkest pay disparity right here in football player vs club staff. shouldnt we be calling...

ah, so you're going to take a couple years data to rule out a decades of trend. its quite disppointing how much of our lives improvements, brought about by economic and technological change are casually overlooked.

and so have living standards, net gain for everyone.

what a loverly idea. what about flexiable tickets to all other event that maybe delayed or cancelled? and shirley under the nationalised railway, there wouldnt be all those supersaver deals that require you to book so far in advance?