Ah, the passive aggressive chord of despair.
No, they weren't a 'disaster'. They were no better and no worse than any other administration. They made mistakes, by their own admission, but they also got things done. It's just lazy, meaningless outer-suburban blubber from you.
Nancy Platts was an excellent candidate.
Instead of putting more resources into winning that marginal seat, Labour put a lot of effort into unseating Caroline Lucas - and it backfired. Twice over.
Kemp Town is far too close to call.
Bearing in mind much UKIP's 2015 vote came from disaffected Labour and Tory voters, it's not easy to determine where their vote will go - if anywhere. Assuming the same number of people vote as last time, we can fairly safely say almost all Green voters from...
He voted for same-sex marriage (a free vote), but has voted with the government on every issue. Or rather, he proudly states he has never voted against the government.
He's voted for...
• reduction in disability benefits
• the so-called 'Bedroom Tax'
• reducing lcoal government funding
•...
No. Gove was a government minister, and will be angling for a role in the new government, should Theresa May be forming it. Much in the same way Diane Abbott would be angling for the Home Secretary role should Corbyn (with or without a coalition partner) get to choose his cabinet.
The principle issue many people have against Labour is the supposedly-unbiased BBC News. Their subtle but obvious vilification of them is a relatively new thing from a broadcaster previously respected for its news output.
The press bias is obvious, and May's omission of Leveson II from the...
In which case - one, why put himself out there, unprepared? And two, this is the form of a former government minister, who should know better. It's not as though Ferrari was Paxmaning him.
Rest assured, if Theresa May gets to pick her own cabinet on June 9, Michael Gove will be hanging around...
Gove doesn't trust experts.
Anyone can offload flannel and bullshit, and sound convincing for it. The fact is, he was there to defend a promote a policy he didn't know enough about, and it showed.