Search results

just an opinion but I think a lot better than what we have at the moment. Better all round then Hemed other than penalties and also quicker. As good as GM in the air but better on the ground and quicker. So all round an improvement.

He would be a similar player to Murray and Hemed but a definite upgrade apparently 3 clubs in Spain including Deportivo are said to be interested also Leeds.

20k per week is £3.12m over a 3 year contract so if he was considered to be as good and £5m cheaper it would represent good business.

Would he not be an improvement on what we have at the moment, with everybody slating GM after yesterdays match.

Isnt that a question for the manager to decide based on how we play and our formation. My point is if the purchase you are talking about falls through wouldnt it be prudent to go after Ulloa at the 11th hour as he is better than what we have at the moment IMHO..

I know this has been mentioned many times but watching GM against Everton yesterday and the play of TH this season so far plus the fact that he still is not in the Leicester squad would it not seem a logical move if all other options fail to try to bring him back in January.

Nothing to do with having played for us previously but the fact that he is better than we have and proven at Premier Level.

I wonder what he would cost because I think he would be an improvement as proven at this level and is now 6th in line at Leicester so perhaps a bid of £3m or £4m would do it.

Is Leo the answer and if so what would he cost? IMHO he is as good if not better than Hemed or Murray as a target man but is quicker than both on the ground.

£50k up front £100 for every goal he scores plus £1000 if we get promotion which appears to be much along the lines of what they offered for DS.

Anybody on here eaten there if so what is it like.

Thought that he was back training but Leicester say he can leave if some body pays the £8m they paid Brighton