Search results

Another poster said that he had had it from an impeccable source, that wages were the issue, £20,000 a week difference in what he was on and what we were willing to pay. He used the term willing to pay which is open to interpretation as to can pay but won't or just can't, I assume that as we...

If the poster that claimed wages were the only issue was correct, it would mean that we were looking to bring him in, despite the similarity to current options. The wages are more of an issue than transfer fee, the fees payed for players are not a concern to other players, the wages are, and if...

I am guessing most players we are interested in would be under contract. What point is it you are trying to make?

This thread post 69 http://www.northstandchat.com/showthread.php?355438-According-to-twitter-we-are-2-1-on-signing-ulloa/page7&highlight=leo+ulloa

Another thread on here, can't remember the poster, but they claimed that they had had it from a very good source that he was wanting to come, but the wage difference was an issue.

I think he would be an improvement, however, I heard it did not happen in the summer due to his wages at Leicester being considerably higher than we were willing to pay, that is unlikely to change.