Search results

I pretty much agree with all of that. However, that doesn't mean I can't view pieces of work in isolation, and I didn't think this was a very good one.

The most insulting pieces of that article, for me, are as follows: 1. "In some cases, smaller or less financially stable clubs rely on this central TV income to pay wages or, in some cases, for their very existence. It's not that long ago that our club was in a similarly perilous position."...

What a dreadful piece. I'm surprised the club put that out.