I didn't say that and as it happens I rate Baldock. I assume the point you are making is we wouldn't have known that when we signed him. I wasn't specifically pointing the finger at the Baldock situation but merely raising the question. We know that Buckley is a sick note but would you buy him...
It's an interesting point though as players do tend to fall into the sick note/non sick note categories. What value do you put on the ability to play regularly. How much better does a 10 game a season player have to be to justify singing him over a 40 game man?