Search results

Calm down Drew, I would say that calling someone a pig ignorant imbecile is certainly getting excited and unable to contain themselves.

You are taking this far too seriously. It's hardly a scare story, just unfortunate sloppy wording. He hasn’t gone to the lengths of sexing up his document to scare us into going to war and invading another country. :facepalm: If you have a problem with his wording you can contact him here...

Who's getting excited ??? You couldn't contain yourself when you first jumped on this thread. My suggestion to you is get over it and don't sign the bloody thing.

I would prefer it to be spot on too, and I have hinted to this many times on here. If I had written it, and could be bothered, it would be different and may have gone with Crime Against Peace. It was a petition that seemed to be doing quite well at 9,300 when I saw it, many don't get beyond...

I am actually expecting the Keystone Cops to arrest and take Blair down to the local nick for questioning the next day. I understand your cynicism but it is more about a public statement and throwing rotten fruit at him than sending him to the gallows. It's a legal public document of...

I agree, it is sloppy, but I agree with the sentiment and intention. The main part is Arrest Tony Blair for war crimes in the middle east and misleading the public. If it goes to parliament it is only the petition title that will be debated, not the sloppyness or phrasing of it. That is best...

It takes far less time to sign it than it does expressing cynicism and going off piste with regards to the Scottish Independence vote. 10,000 signatures gets a government response. 100,000 will be considered for debate in Parliament. It's not hard to grasp and takes 5 seconds to sign it. It’s...

Fair points At the time he was reelected the war was such a mess, I believe the general consensus by the public was that the only the person who got us into the the war had the responsibility of making things right and getting us out of it. He still failed to to this, but I don’t even think...

I understand your point, but regarless of who supplied what the US approved of it, were highly influencial, and used other countries to supply their weapons. From an Iranian view http://www.iranchamber.com/history/articles/arming_iraq.php is there anything in here that you disagree with...

It doesn't make any difference at all to the petition. Hundreds of thousands of innocent men, women and children were slaughtered and the country was razed to the ground. Is that not bad enough? Clearly you were not going to sign anyway no matter how it was worded, and were more intent on...

Disagreeing is one thing but starting with pig ignorant imbecile is a bit OTT. I am only endorsing the sentiment and intention of the petition, it now has over 11,000 and I am happy to help it even if the phrasing is sloppy. I can't change that.

They were all at it. It doesn't matter how much or how little countries supported him they still did. I mentioned France and I seem to remember that it was their wmd that was used on the Kurds. Here is a list of countries who did business with and supported a fascist dictator. Austria Brazil...

Anyway since I posted the thread at 7:30 almost 600 people have signed. Current total 10,184 signatures and rising. Government responds to all petitions that get more than 10,000 signatures. 100% Complete At 100,000 signatures, this petition will be considered for debate in Parliament. 10%...

Someone should have told Blair and Bush that. Sticks and stones though to be fair.

Do behave, he called me a pig ignorant imbecile ???

The fascist dictator who the US, UK and France supplied weapons to in the Iran Iraq war, and the chemical weapons he used against the Kurds. I know what Christopher Hitchens view is, I also know what Hans Blix, David Kelly, Robin Cook and Clare Short's view were as well. I can only presume you...

Clearly a Blairite if you condone a) Clearly a Blairite Clearly apathetic

Don't be an arrogant pedantic cvnt, I didn't word it, it’s not my petition, but thousands of coalition soldiers died along with hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians. All you are doing is picking on the use of words which I have no control over. As soon as you see something that may not...

That point can be argued later in Parliament if it gets to 100,000 signatures. At this stage I don’t think it is a good reason to not sign because the sentiment is the same with or without that sentence. I beg to differ on your point though because everything was contained and just needed...

:) Thanks, I have added it now.