Search results

I'm not saying that Gus didn't say the things included in the article. I am saying he probably said other stuff that was not included. The tone of the article is at least influenced and at most set by the writer, who maybe had a hidden agenda.

With all the comments about what was mentioned and what wasn't mentioned, somebody had to write the article, presumably, after talking to Gus. One would need to hear the interview before being able to judge along the lines some are doing here. Perhaps it was the writer who made it all about Gus.