Fair point but if he was 'sacked' for another reason then I would expect the school to be able to say so immediately. The declined to comment or we'll comment later attitude of so many public bodies ( and the 'we don't comment on individual cases' statement ) drives me mad. They are either...
I'm going on about it because he supports a perfectly legal political party and so the Head shouldn't have even suggested to him his political affiliation had anything to do with his appointment as a governor. If he was pressured to resign then the school could release a statement immediately -...
You suggested I 'would agree' so in the context of your post what I'd rather does count.
Anyway, so he might disagree with a particular policy but that's no reason to get rid of a long serving governor.
Oh come on - the Head can't just click her fingers and get rid of him. It would be the board of governors that got rid of him and they would have had to follow the process and document it. One might suggest that all they need to do is publish said documentation and the problem goes away but of...
The school will comment on Monday to give themselves time to concoct some believable statement. If due process had been followed they could comment now.
Maybe some bellend overlooked that !
Firstly he switched from being an independent to UKIP Secondly, if a school has an influx of pupils of a particular nationality I'd rather resources were targeted at making making THEIR first language English rather than teaching other pupils Polish or whatever.