Search results

they reached the verdict that she was too drunk for consent in the circumstances.

thats because the circumstances where different. one she has time to change her mind, the second she apparently doesnt. far too much is being made of the drunkeness, the point is the circumstances of where and how the act occured. the judge did not decree its illegal to shag someone drunk...

to be fair, that is at the heart of this case, and why it is still being debated.

there was outcry over King and McCormack, but they showed remorse, regret for their actions, kept their head down and go on with the process of redeeming themselves (not in everyones eyes of course). Evans refuses to begin this process. if he wants to profess his innocence still, then until he...

no. one of the key issues, and making this case notably different to the likes of Marlon King, Luke McCormick and host of others, is contrition. he hasnt shown any as he continues to protest his innocence. once he shows this the process of his rehabilitation and acceptance back into society...

sooo, according to Mr Gilhooly, date rape with rohypnol is ok. so long as you dont slap them about or leave a mark. think the PFAI needs to have some new legal representation. i'd also offer this test for Gilhooly: if it happened to you would it be OK with it?

pretty sure there was, if not petitions definatly a strong feeling he shouldn't be welcome in the football world.