The girl in her evidence States not remembering leaving the bar and only a vague recollection of ordering food. She met McDonald After that so she obviously doesn't remember giving consent to him either
Yet 12 people found McDonald 'not guilty' with the same Evidence. Plenty of ro for Human error.
Also Jury's are picked on the basis of the right people for the defence & prosecution are they not?
Off their own backs? To report what?
I intend to sit and read case file that's been posted when i get home.
The most bemusing thing for me is if the conviction of rape is around consent (which it mostly is) how is it if the girl has no recollection of going to the hotel at all then surely...
Can some one answer a query for me? If the girl had no recollection of the incident, including going to the hotel, then how did she know she had sex with both men? Was this something she reported and they agreed with her series of events or did she make the complaint about both parties?
I'm...