Search results

They might be. As a sponsor, I wanted as much flexibility to pull the sponsorship as I could get; the recipient conversely wants to give me as little as possible. The tighter the clause is drafted, the less wiggle room there is. For example, it's unlikely that there would be a specific clause...

Well, yes I guess so. It would be an extremely high risk strategy though, to say the least. But, not completely impossible, I suppose!

There will definitely be a contract. The specific terms will be unique to each one, though, when I've done sponsorship I've always insisted on a clause tht allows me to pull out if the other party brings themselves into disrepute. I would anticipate that it would be this clause that a sponsor...

Quite. Puts not having enough Harvey's at a game into perspective. BHAFC is capable of some screw ups, but all the time we have the current regime I doubt we'd ever cock up quite as badly as Oldham have managed. They really have managed to engineer a PR disaster in a very short space of...

Yep, you're quite right - I misunderstood the point Husty was making. I've edited my post accordingly.

EDIT: As HKFC points out in the post below this, I misinterpreted the point you were making - apologies.

Apologies if this has been posted before (I haven't read the whole thread), but I thought that in order to be released after half your sentence you have to admit guilt and show remorse. Since he has done neither, how come he's out?