Search results

It is. But people don't normally piss there pants and run to the media with it. Unless it suits their agenda to do so. Which may have been the case.

Or maybe, as Winston Churchill (heard of him??) so convincingly put it; ‘I have nothing to offer but blood, toil, tears and sweat’. But not the prerequisite experience of being Prime Minister obviously.

This is the way forward. Forget your 'first past the post' and 'proportional representation' electoral systems. Lets have a 'you can only be Prime Minister if youve done it before for 5 years' system!

Yeah cos Cameron really give Paxman what for didnt he?! Just like he stormed to victory over Brown. Oh hang on; no he didnt did he?! He failed to beat the most unpopular prime minister for flip knows how long! He must be really good at this politics thing.

Diddums. I haven't been able to afford to have a Sh1te for 5 years with the current failures having a go at running the country, in the style of a bloke dragged out of a pub to ensure a really poor football team doesn't get fined for not having enough players! Only to find they're arent...

Phew. Thanks for clarifying.

Thats the true test of running a country after all isnt it; the ability of eating a bacon sandwich whilst people are taking a photo of you?

The crisis in the NHS and the NHS overall is going to be the undoing of Cameron and cost him this election. In effect this may mean that his loses it, rather than Milliband win it. A bit like last time; Cameron didnt win it; Brown lost it. The Tories themselves admit that what they have...

The Office For National Statistics also says that the national debt has hit £1.457 Trillion, having increased by £89.7 billion in 12 months, despite an increase in VAT and welfare cuts that take the living standards of the poor back to 1930s levels. Despite this Cameron announced £7 billion of...

And when were the bandings reviewed? They haven't been. Theyre 20 odd years out of date.

Is it any worse than turfing people out of their homes that they have lived in for a couple of decades as a punishment for the failure of consecutive governments to build enough affordable housing?

Not by stimulating growth at all? Only by cuts?

Oh right. Sorry. So there wont be a deficit come the next election due entirely to the cuts as predicted. Apologies all round.

Thats very well written. If I were curious I might think that had been ripped from somewhere. At least credit it or give the link! Anyway; regardless of whether they rise rapidly or not lots of people will be caught out again, which will have an overall effect on the economy. The government...

Or you could put it another way; for all the cuts: why isnt the deficit paid off as it was stated that it would be?!

Once again; unemployment is low due, in part, to many people being forced into low income/zero hours/part time work. Very vulnerable employment when things go down the shitpan again soon. Interest rates are indeed low and have been for a very long time so many will have got used to that, and...

Not a U-Turn at all sir, more the point (some might say proven fact now) that you dont reduce a deficit by making cuts alone.

Are you aware of the immigration figures for the last 12 months that have come after the present governments 'cap' on immigration?

Union bossed Labour Party? Are you aware of the reforms that Milliband is bringing in regarding the Union/Labour Party connection?

The planet 'Great Britain' in 2014 unfortunately. I dont know what the BCC is and I dont know what the UK economy 'expecting' to grow by 3.2% this year or 47.9% has got to do with your assertion that the economy is already better?! The CBI may report that retailers are at their most optimistic...