Search results

:lolol:

The problem I have is that it was a) on the homepage and b) there were no warnings. I didn't click on an article, I didn't have a good gawp, I clicked the daily mail logo and saw some pretty heavy images without asking to. I'm not pissing my knickers, I just asked if it was normal. I don't think...

I didn't see the print version. It was on the front page of the site. I don't have a blind hatred, that's why I choose to read certain articles every now and then, mainly the sport, but occasionally others. Overall I don't like what I read. I don't like the way that IN A LOT of their articles...

I was reading the sport, then I clicked the homepage. I perhaps should have said "God knows why I was on their site, I don't like most of what I read on there and should have known better"... And what would stop a ten year old from accessing said images? Look I'm not going to go screaming for...

Yes. Yes it is. I don't give a shit who shows/doesn't show it. It shouldn't be chucked in your face like that.

For reasons unknown I found myself on the homepage of the Mail and was greeted by two photos of mass murder, FOLLOWED BY a caption warning of graphic content. Too late I've already bloody seen it. I've seen lots online about these horrible events in Kenya and Iraq, but purposefully avoided...