So why does the public inquiry need to be re-opened? Surley JP can just ask for an independant report to be complied on these sites and then decide whether Falmer should be approved. It seems we are just going over old ground again. What benifit does the new public inquiry give? All i can...
Remeber it took 8 months from the end of the last inquiry to get to this point. Now we have to basically start again and re-argue the case for Falmer whilst the Nimbys can just ramble on and on about the possibility of other sites. What if say Waterhall gets suggested and the end of the new...
It would be great news apart from the fact that it will go on for years and cost us more £££'s that we have not got. Has any deadline been set for thisnew inquiry? The first public inquiry should have dealt with this issue fully. The whole process is a joke.