Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Register Log in

Search results

  1. M

    The Decision - YES, but first prove there's nowhere else available

    he would've gone with the two reports and said NO back in Jan, that would've been plenty of time for any "trouble" too die down and be lost. JP aint worried about any demo or crap at a conference anyway as no-one will get anywhere near him or the party...mainly due to terrorist threats but if...
  2. M

    The Decision - YES, but first prove there's nowhere else available

    exactly and then he says NO to Falmer, again we could say "well we simply cant afford it" and he says ok Falmer it is, or he says "tough titty!" and we are left stranded.....THAT is whats worrying me
  3. M

    The Decision - YES, but first prove there's nowhere else available

    ok thanks for explaining it. still not sure though!
  4. M

    The Decision - YES, but first prove there's nowhere else available

    Answer me this to clear my head as still confused: WHERE does JP say that Falmer is YES *if* no other site is viable enough? As i read it he's just asking about other sites and wants reports on them, nothing I have read as categorically (sp?) stated that we WILL get Falmer if all other sites...
  5. M

    The Decision - YES, but first prove there's nowhere else available

    http://www.streetmap.co.uk/newmap.srf?x=534500&y=104500&z=3&sv=534500,104500&st=4&mapp=newmap.srf&searchp=newsearch.srf&dn=642 rigt where the arrow is
  6. M

    The Decision - YES, but first prove there's nowhere else available

    As i understand it: In the original enquiry the Club put foreward the "other sites are not viable" case as a seperate area that had nothing to do with the actual proper enquiry. Meaning that if Prescott said Yes then Falmer NIMBYS/Lewes Council could use that as the Judicial Review option, but...

Top
Link Here