OK, I see this and accept it's a valid argument.
But, this means we don't have any evidence to base it on, just our interpretation of why he has extended the enquiry.
I hope you're right, but I have to say I'm not convinced. How do we know he doesn't just think that saying "no, you can't have...
Lord Bracknell (or anyone else who can answer definitively),
I still haven't seen an answer to the question already asked "what evidence do you have to that Prescott has accepted our arguments, and just needs to be convinced there's nowhere else."
I've read Collyer's report, and it's clear we...