Search results

As I said, I realise that's your take on it, and I didn't say otherwise. I'm just pointing out that it's not me that's endorsing it.

No, that is the approach of FFP. I understand that you don't like it, and I don't disagree with you. But at the moment, those are the rules, and I don't see the problem with allowing genuine sponsorship deals and not allowing fake ones.

Presumably the fine applies to last year's activity, not this.

If Untied's is genuine, and City's is not, then I agree.

I think you mean libel.

I don't want to offend any of our local legal bods, but I ****ing hate lawyers. I mean, I really, really ****ing hate them.

Indeed. What's not to like, everyone's a winner.

If they make £50m stick, then fair play, I take my hat off. Any idea where the £50m goes? (lawyers and backhanders I presume).