Search results

Agree with you broadly in relation to the lower leagues, the rules there are a wage/revenue ratio.

As Morrissey himself said "Fair enough"

....and FFP was brought in to appease the established clubs and prevent them breaking away to form their own league.

By taking that approach you are effectively endorsing the likes of United, Barcelona and Real being uncatchable in perpetuity. There's no more wrong in PSG, City or Chelsea's owners bankrolling their clubs than a bunch of sadsacks in Guildford and Singapore buying Jonny Evans duvet covers and...

I can see where you're coming from SC but the rules are flawed and arbitrary.

The same as City. http://uk.reuters.com/article/2014/05/06/uk-soccer-uefa-ffp-idUKKBN0DM0LR20140506

But FFP is unfair to begin with, as it protects the elite from competition and creates a self promoting, self perpetuating cartel. Businesses go bust due to debt, not profit/loss. UEFA have said that it's acceptable for Manchester United to have a £53m a year shirt deal, but not acceptable for...