:lolol: Don’t bring me into this again.
It was a response to Goldstone76 saying ”If you’re so sure a government doesn’t tell a lie to go to war then you’re a fool.”
His context was in a reply to me and he was assuming that because I don’t believe the 911 conspiracy theories that I therefore...
I've never said that governments don't lie to go to war, Others and myself has clearly stated that the war in Iraq was based on a WMD lie, that is not a Conspiracy Theory that is a Conspiracy FACT.
If you understand the word theory you would understand that a theory is something that hasn't yet...
Look, it is plausible that the USAF had good reason to shoot it down after failing to stop the first three from hitting their targets. Flight 93 was the last hijacked plane and it was heading to Washington. So if we say it had to be taken out, but the US government covered it up because of the...
Wreckage was found south of where Flight 93 crashed, in the direction it was heading. If it was blown up in mid air, wreckage would have been found before and after the impact crater. In fact if blown up in mid ait there would not even be an impact crater.
Anything else ???
:lolol: Yep I should know better by now.
They even maintain that the fourth plane was missiled and shot down by the USAF over Shanksville field, and not only that if it was the case, all traces of wreckage that would have been strewn for miles, like Lokcerbie, were nowhere to be seen.
They...
I wasn't going to post anymore but you make such a good point.
If the USAF shot down the plane with a missile, the wreckage would have been that of Lockerbie and would have been was strewn for miles. Whereas a plane nose diving into the ground would have left a crater. and at the speed it hit...
Yep using cardboard boxes doesn't come close to replicating the science and scale of what happened. A dumb example by your leader.
The towers didn't freefall anyway as explained in the video I uploaded earlier.
You haven't recruited any converts on here so your mission has been a complete...
The difference between the video I gave you and you gave me is that Richard Gage is the leading campaigner in the truth for 911.
Great way to avoid a direct question again though :clap2:
Err, so you haven't been reading any of my posts over the last week then have you. All of my answers are contained within this thread and I am not going to double up on them for your sake if you took no notice the first, second or third time round.
Bollards, in your last video Prof Jones says there were explosives used.
Bollards it's a perfectly good narrative.
Sorry but I have no doubt that a friend of mine who I've know for almost 30 years and who has been a qualified architect for 25 years would be telling me the truth.
As you...
By the way I have just spoken to an architect mate of mine on the phone and he says that the towers would have collapsed from the plane impact with destroying all the fire proofing, followed by extreme heat from the fire to weaken steel, not melt, and undermine the structural integrity would...
Yep all ten of the structrual engineers in this video.
Look, 80% of Americans believe in God.
Two videos here, not for you Goldsone, hybrid x or The Truth, this is for the benefit of the readers of the thread to get a balanced view.
First is a controlled demolition and the explosions...
Yep, the Yanks couldn't have pulled off such a massive operation involving thousands of conspirators even if they wanted to. Even when they got Bin Laden they crashed one of the two helicopters.
If America wanted an excuse to go to war, just one remote controlled plane into one tower would have...
:lolol: I will give you an example of what you do.
Do you see what you did there? You said you can't pigeonhole humanity, and then immediately after, you pigeonholed humanity.:mad:
The wheels on the bus go round and round, round and round, round and round.
The wheels on the bus go round and...