Search results

Exactly what point are you trying to make with that link?

Are you going to do the same in respect of Russian and China and their contracts with Syria?

My take on this at the present time is that, firstly, Cameron jumped the gun by calling back parliament and seeking to join any military action that the US were planning. He was reigned in by Miliband but this backfired on both of them when neither Labours motion nor the amended Tory one was...

If that is what you base your conclusion on then it is pathetic. Syrians have chemical weapons (and have allegedly used them on 14 occasions) so the rebels claim they can match them. They might have the know how but the report says they have the components, not the finished product ready for...

All these people banging on about the UN should be aware that you will never get a motion agreed because Russia and/or China have their own agenda and their own attitude to human rights would suggest they don't give a monkeys about a few arabs getting gassed so long as it doesn't affect their...

Any stats as to how many died under Saddam's regime? If Cameron is so statesmen like then why did he have to back track from his original postition before the debate of seeking a mandate straight away for military action. That said I don't think there is too much difference between the two...