And yet many people denied any PR issue from the clubs side around the Gus saga ! The balance has changed, in the desire to wring every pound into the till the club have made some glaring mistakes.
Under contract law - probably. They sold you a ticket that the web site ( via the charter ) clearly indicated included travel. The club have three choices of remedy :
1. Give you the product you purchased in full ( i.e. with travel included )
2. Compensate you for your loss due to them breaking...
Isn't that how this thread started ? Regardless, I ( and others clearly ) thought that the planning permission enforced a travel plan on every competitive game and that's why people had to contribute to it - I'm genuinely interested how the club are getting round the condition - surely that...
Strange isn't it - the club break the contract they have with fans who have paid for the travel surcharge and all they do change the contract. The manager allegedly breaks the contract he has with the club and they get rid of him. Maybe the club should get rid of someone else ?