Search results

That wouldn't make sense as that would mean we have already decided it was ok for Tanno to refuse, but are still "investigating" whether it was ok for Charlie to refuse. #confused

Don't see that. You're suggesting we have tried to find a cheap way out because of FFP. Well, once the lawyers get as involved as they have done here, with a potential ET on the horizon, then you only know whether this was the cheaper way out for a few months yet. Meanwhile, we have fallen...

Still sounds like a simple case of manager and chairman falling out. There is only one winner in those situations. But why, 1. Have we not just done what every other club does in these situations, and sack him, say a few nice platitudes about "mutual agreement" then agree the settlement...