Let's get this right. You deliberately took a somewhat controversial and at times downright offensive viewpoint on a discussion about sex with schoolchildren just because you felt that too many people thought the criminal in question deserved what he got..or worse.
If you're going to play...
If you have said he deserved it then why do you think he did? If I have read your arguments correctly you think that she's not a child but a woman. In which case all he has done is breach a trust as a teacher. Morally reprehensible but hardly a crime. You're the one insinuating the law is wrong...
A 15 year old is by definition a kid. And again...he manipulated a vulnerable girl's feelings. 15 year olds do not have the emotional maturity that 30 year olds would have.
And a further point...how sexually active was she? Up until this teacher came along it was non-existent.
You're a wrong...
Can you not see the difference between a 15 year old boy getting tops and fingers off a classmate and the 30 year old schoolteacher doing it?
You need to think about this. Seriously..you really need to consider why one is a crime and the other not.
a) I'm sure she is. It's only been a few days since they were together. Her feelings are as a result of him grooming her.
b) I agree the sentencing seems to be all over the place but he committed a sex crime with a child he was trusted with looking after.
c) err.....are you a spoof account...
She was 14 when he started grooming her, they were kissing each other when she was 14 too (we'll never know what else they were doing) but even if she was 15 it would still have been perverted.
edit - HKFC answered it much better. I'm just shocked that grown men seem to think that it's okay for...
You don't think a 30 year old married teacher having sex with a 14 year old pupil is perverted? Have I got that right? I'd be interested to know what you regard as perverted.
Actually, scrub that last comment. I'm not sure I do want to know.