I don't think that's a fair comment. Yes, sponsors generate a lot of revenue and that's the case across pretty much all top two division clubs. However, it's set a precedent, a bar if you like, where now all clubs rely on the sponsorship money, or else be left way behind. The point was not to...
Call me old fashioned but it does get to me how grounds are named by the sponsor nowadays. Our stadium is Falmer. Emirates should be called Drayton Park, Leicester and bloody Walkers etc etc.
Am I the only this gets to or do others have similar thoughts sometimes?