Search results

*sigh* which are non-existant unless he has a massive advantage with budgets. We are going round and round in circles. "Redknapp would be a great manager" "No he wouldn't" "Yes he would - look what he did at Spurs" "Yes, but he had a MASSIVE budget there, like everywhere else he's been" "But...

Yes, but my post was in response to your assertion that Ferguson has probably spent about the same amount of money that Redknapp did. I replied by pointing out that one has won numerous trophies whereas the other has finished 4th twice. To put it simply, Redknapp will do a shit job if he is...

No. Promotion at St Mirren along with a title and European success at Aberdeen - all on a shoestring and against comparable or far better resourced clubs - would suggest that he had talent long before he walked into probably the biggest job in the country. And when he did spend millions at...

Indeed. Which is why Bloom won't bring 'arry here. He'll know he is a shithouse manager who can't work within a reasonable budget.

It's bollocks because as stated, Redknapp played him at left back and then tried to offload him. Did he bring Bale to the club? No. Did Bale underperform this season without Redknapp or did he actually improve? Says it all really.

Yes, really. Spurs were NEVER as bad as the position he had found them in suggested. Spurs are a much bigger club than all but about 6 teams in the league. Spurs promptly gave him an enormous war chest.

No chance. He's never done anything anywhere without the odds stacked in his favour.