see this baffles me. all you are doing is stating the obvious - yes there are probably procedures in place to deal with all sorts of potential issues but systems break down. everyone can grasp this. simply repeating this over and over again doesnt detract from the moral responsibility people...
if she had rung up the radio station first that arugument might carry some more weight. who initiated this chain of events? the DJ's. so in my eyes irrespective of what happened next means they are ultimately to blame.
if this woman had simply got sacked none of us would know and i am sure...
very good post. some of the views expressed on here to the end that if you find this distasteful you are part of a hysterical mob, are very immature and smart alecy. its really simple, dont do something liable to upset people or cause them problems. why you can hold a view that this is anyone...
haha spot on its incredibe how conspiracy theorists never actually appear on their radar for some reason, despite having uncovered them. but then i am sure they can tell you a reason for that as well.
no dont make any that might cause people loads of grief in real life. its that simple. we wouldnt have known about more minor implications for her, no matter how bad they may be. doesnt mean they are not real though. if she had just been sacked i would still think these people are thoughtless...
you are missing my point mate. at no point do i say they could have predicted she would top herself. but if she had simply been sacked you would never have heard of it, and never known she lost her job 2 weeks before christmas in the worst recession in living memory. which is still f***ing...
my point over and over again is yes, you could reasonably predict this could end very badly for an innocent person. you dont have to be eva petulengro to see that.
it could reasonably be predicted you could ruin someones life over this. or at least cause them a hell of a lot of trouble. reason enough not to do it. sorry they have made a massive mistake and its their problem no one elses. they are not children.
you could predict by doing this you could get an employee into f***ing loads of trouble quite easily. not that they might top themself but i think stopping because you might lose someone their job or cause them distress is enough. not knowing that they might kill themself is hardly absolution...
really? that they never expected to get through (bet they were thrilled to bits when they did, not hoping, oh i hope we dont get through we only want to have a laugh) and secondly, that it was impossible to concieve that this might end badly? if you agree with both of those then you are not...
of course dissecting events afterwards and realising things could be done better serves a purpose. otherwise we would be still sitting in caves going ug and dropping boulders on mammouths heads for food.
if they never expected to get through then why do it. they had a go. they wanted to get through. secondly you could anticipate a bad ending to this for someone on the recieving end,(admittedly not this bad) if you had half a brain. you could reasonably predict that by doing this would get...