Search results

Doesn't mean they are right though. I reckon quite a few would also say that paedos is plural so shouldn't include an apostrophe in it.

Did like that.

Any chance of either of you spelling paedophile correctly? They're not made of peas you know.

It's no wonder we are always being asked to donate blood. Most of It's usually on other peoples hands according to the media and several drama queens on here.

Like I said, that's where I think we disagree. And will have to agree to disagree. I'm certainly not a genius, but I don't know who Eva Petulengro is either :o)

Yes, but they didn't think about the consequences did they? Of the grief they were giving her. So, where does that sit on the scale of judgement compared to the hoax callers?

Exactly. It now appears according to Sky at the moment that she was getting grief from fellow staff as a result. Fill your boots people, let's all clamber up the moral high ground over them now.

Agree with that, sorry, phrased it rather badly there. Talking about judging the people rather than learning from the consequences itself. I think the key point is that we disagree whether they could have predicted it or not.

Did you predict it? Even after the event when you'd heard about it? There isn't a single person on here who in that situation would have thought "what if we get through and someone like tells us stuff and then the press worldwide tells the story and the person kills herself?"

Did you think that could be the chain of events when it was first revealed? It's all very unsavoury and tragic, but this post event blame game stuff really doesn't wash or serve any purpose in my view.

I think a little bit of hindsight is being used here. Firstly, they never expected to be put through and secondly nobody could have anticipated that this would be the result. Including people now so quick to judge them.