This has the right of truth. Palace is a club supported by idiots and shysters.
- - - Updated - - -
I am sure I read that after the first one.
I suggest you don't come on here if you do not like to be reminded.
The impact was that other well run clubs suffered. You can call it bad management I call it cheating. Cheating - because they knew the potential fallback position. And once, you can maybe explain away. But twice ? Anyway - whatever the description the impact is the same.
I am not sitting all...
What percentage was it. Are we talking about 80% or 1%. I can see how an informal agreement would not be looked kindly on by an insolvency practice - but it seems quite sensible. And the creditors did not have to agree did they ?
You haven't but Clubs who did not get promoted or got relegated as a result of the financial cheating of other clubs were thoroughly f***ed over. And your club did it twice. Can't be pleasant to hear that about ones club.
And the last refuge of the rogue is to blame the governing bodies.