Search results

But this only relates to one of his abusers. If there is no suspicion of a cover up then why is there now to be an inquiry into the investigations that took place at the time?

I don't follow your logic. I assume you are talking about McAlpine who has strenuously denied any involvement. However, I thought the suggestion was it was a member of that family with a similar first name who has now died. Notwithstanding that, you seem to suggest that because one senior...

So the investigation carried out by Waterson in 1997 didn't involve the Police! The Police are almost certainly aware of the names on the list but their hands are tied from above. The original inquiry would only consider the names that were included in the statements by the victims and as I...

I think it is totally irrelevant who asks the question. Some highbrow journalists have obviously avoided the issue otherwise they would have made more of Tom Watsons question in Parliament. This isn't just about paedophelia, it also raises more concerns about the corruptness of the...

Probably the important question is whether the 'accidental' disclosure of the list as he passed it to CMD was in fact that, accidental, or was it engineered? Giving them the benefit of the doubt, maybe this is the sort of thing more mainstream media should have done. It would be niaive to even...