Search results

To be fair, it was both meant as a red flag waving in faces... But also what I genuinely believe without any knowledge of any kind. He PLAYED. I suspect this was a sign. Or a red herring. Hmmmmm.

I don't think the loanee is Lukaku. We couldn't afford to wait around until the end of the window. If Chelsea want him out on loan for experience, he'll go out on loan before the start of the season. Because of his age, he doesn't need to be registered in the 25 man Premier League squad. I don't...

Does Lukaku fit the bill for the seemingly thrilling backup option we're contemplating? His transfer fee to Chelsea was ridiculous, and it would be amazing to see an £18million striker from a year earlier play for Brighton. So long as he doesn't play like Man City's £18million striker did at...

I'm not doubting either of you. But how "secure" can he be if we haven't signed him? I would hate to be treated like that, "we've agreed terms with your club and with you, but ideally we won't sign you, but the other guy. In the meantime, just wait for us to decide." Or am I wrong?

Fee?

It will be announced at the forum, no question about it. :clap: Might even UNLEASH him on us.

:lolol: That is THE most tenuous link I've ever read. :facepalm:

:lolol: :clap: :lolol: Just say what you see! Classic. For me, the clear highlight of this thread.