On piece of paper true enough.
But the concept has existed for a long, long time. Just back then it was a river, a valley or a outcrop of rocks that defined the boundaries.
Crossing them did have consequences though.
It's a reminder that we are very much part of the animal kingdom.
What does it matter what anyone believes in if they are happy and harming nobody.
People don't simply "resort" to believing in something.
There's no such thing as "the real world". You merely live in your version of it.
Well it's generally down to greed that humanity has enacted conflict.
Borders are established to try to make a point of stating what is yours and what isn't.
A great deal of human conflict involved one bunch of humans wanting to move into the territory of another and to expand its borders.
Well given the scare tactics being used by science over climate change I'd think if science wasn't such a big factor in daily life we might still die younger, but the planet would be in far better shape.
So then no religion is actually bad, only the people within it.
Meaning if no religion existed people would be absolutely no different to how they are now with religion present.
On that I agree.
Science needs to be held back, it's not some benevolent creature that is capable of only good.
You're so enamored with science you forget the horrific experiments it has carried out and the consequences of its creations that have utterly destroyed people and societies over the years.
One mad...