Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Search results

  1. peterward

    Vicente has [not] signed [yet]

    that would be my guess, but a guess none the less. It may well have been the OP getting completely duff info from someone who is clueless, either way since CMS every tip has been wrong
  2. peterward

    Vicente has [not] signed [yet]

    Poyet: “It would have been amazing to say ‘Vicente is staying and he has signed a new contract’. “Instead it didn’t happen" Brian Owen Argus (twitter): ‏Brian__Owen "So to sum up a busy evening, ‪#bhafc‬ have extended the Vicente deal, Vicente has not re-signed. BHAFC have basically protected...
  3. peterward

    Vicente has [not] signed [yet]

    how do you come to that conclusion Mellotron, he hasn't signed...... far from it, it seems the deal was going south and thus the club invoked the extension. "Vicente has signed" was factually incorrect. i am not doubting sitch's intentions but he has been wrong a lot more than right.
  4. peterward

    Vicente has [not] signed [yet]

    he really signed last week? cool, will be a great addition with Mattock and Trotter, thanks for the top tip
  5. peterward

    Vicente has [not] signed [yet]

    ITK Sitch has said he HAS signed
  6. peterward

    Vicente has [not] signed [yet]

    Playing the odds, Gus says its 90-95% so easy chance to try uphold the ITK credentials

Top
Link Here