Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Search results

  1. L

    Vicente has [not] signed [yet]

    That option has yes. But Sitch said "Vicente has signed", i.e. he'd signed the new deal the club were offering - which he hasn't (yet). Which is completely different to the club extending the contract regardless of whether Vicente may or may not have wanted it
  2. L

    Vicente has [not] signed [yet]

    Gus has only ever said it was 90%-95% done - Sitch claimed it was 100% done and just not being announced - i.e. a lie
  3. L

    Vicente has [not] signed [yet]

    Steve Sidwell and Fabian Delph would be pretty handy!
  4. L

    Vicente has [not] signed [yet]

    Ignore
  5. L

    Vicente has [not] signed [yet]

    To be in talks with Trotter we would have had to have agreed a deal with Millwall wouldn't we? And all the Millwall sources said no contact had been made from anyone over Trotter, despite the supposed interest from us and possibly Saints.
  6. L

    Vicente has [not] signed [yet]

    Exactly Acker. He only seems to post stuff that's pretty common knowledge but claiming it's some sort of insider info. Easy to hide behind the 'oh it fell through' line too. Certain people are worthy of believing their bits of info on here, others aren't.

Top
Link Here