Understood ... tbf by the time Sitch posted it was pretty well accepted by most if not all that Vicente had "signed" (well, agreed to show up) so not sure I gave him any credit for a scoop. As it happens there's been a twist in the tale. Sitch got it wrong but I think maybe Gus got it wrong too...
Why? As I understand it he hasn't signed. Indeed there isn't (or doesn't need to be anyway) anything to sign, he's just been told to report back for pre season as we've changed our mind (for whatever reason) about letting him go if that's what he wanted.
Detective in me thinks Vicente may have...
Just to clarify I've put about 4 posts into this thread and remain a "squabble free zone" but if it helps I can get into one, don't want to be the odd one out!
It would be dumb for him to make such a strong claim if it weren't going to happen. Can't imagine Vicente himself would be too enamoured by seeing the 95% plastered across the press if it weren't his view too. To be 95% you gotta believe it's all sorted bar a few loose ends, none of which will...