Search results

edna krabappel post 35 crime, i prefer to call it desperation for love and/or chips (money), to get food, shelter, and food.....in a system that is stacked against the many and provides little opportunity. change the system. but as it stands, to answer, i would get criminals (as you call...

1. where? 2. my reply was to someone who said he obeys ALL laws. 3. totally, it is not a NEED. this is an absolute. think food, water, shelter. bonus 4. i think you need to re-read the whole thread a bit more slowly and see my replies were to certain person's comments.... my two...

Springal (my friends). so easy you lot are, end up with insults and swearing at me.........lol....because you can't debate the points....lol.... .....for arguing that not having insurance is NOT worse than drink driving.....and that obeying ALL laws is dangerous and a bit silly. let me...

again, subjective and a projection from your life experiences. i had no desire to get A levels, or hang out with such types. ditchy

ROFL so anyone who does not obey all laws is deluded? I am my own law, my word is my law, my agreements are my law, my promises are my law, any authorities putting rules on me is folly. insurance should be an option, not forced. do you know how many laws have come into the EU in the...

? i never went to 6th form so see no relevance in the post.

intelligence is subjective, so that is obviously something you are projecting onto me. thanks :-) free thinking is everyone's right is it not? if people feel patronised, then that is their problem is it not? there is not intent to patronise anyone, but my response regarding insurance and...

lol. baaaaa. i bet you follow any rules no matter what "because they are the rules." grow up one day huh?

It's proven prison does not work to rehabilitate people or solve any pain caused, so the "conclusions" that people have as this being the solution are bereft of truth. The "lock em up and throw away the key" I believe is a group think paradigm. If each person independently spent time...

my comment was referring to insurance and disqualified (not the drink driving) --- these two are hardly crimes of the century. insurance companies perform so much ill in the world it is untrue (where they invest). if someone ran over a close one, no money would ease the blow, or help...

why is that worse? insurance is a scam, and if one has passed a test one is good enough to drive. drink driving is much worse - i would certainly drive if disqualified - one is just another car. if you think the judicial system is just i think you should open your eyes and do some...