So if you play both of them, who you going to take out of midfield?
Personally i'd love to see Barnes up front in place of them both and see how that goes. He couldnt do any worse and he'll be playing in his natural position for once.
I love the way Elliot Bennet is thought by some to be the messiah. They even jizz themselves when he scores for Norwich. WTF.
Id take a crocked vicente in front of bennet all day long.
Hate to say it but, old dogs and new tricks, spring to mind.
I would love to see CMS be the player i thought he might be for us more than anything but my eyes tell me differently. Against these types of quality championship defenders he has struggled to show the neccesary quality required for...
This is getting tiresome week after week.
As previosuly stated his all round game should be much better than it is whether you play to his strengths or not. Simple really!!
Finishing wise, i think we mean within the box/6 yard area. Playing in the positions he does doesnt always allow him to be in that poachers position, which i believe he's half decent at.
Cms's finishing has been at best, untidy where as barnes in the few times he's been in that position has...
Agree that barnes should be playing as a forward but then if you play 2 up front you have to lose 1 in midfield. Gus loves to pack the midfield because he doesnt like to give the oppo the chance to dominate us through the middle. Unless you have a player who can do the job of the 2 defensive...
Exactly! nobody. His first touch has let him down so many times ive lost count.
Im not saying hes a bad player, im saying he isnt good enough for this league in a promotion chasing side.
Its worth remembering that a decent striker should be able to have an all round game, especially when you pay 3M or so. Each and every decent striker should be able to hold the ball up well enough, bring others into play and be half decent at finishing. To say that CMS's game is just limited to...