Search results

Oh, an atheist then.

Again, you are another confusing the historical person who has become known as Jesus and the Jesus of the christian faith. I am an atheist (not sure what a 100% atheist is) and believe that such a person did exist - Jesus that is, not the bunny.

Yawn. Another confused soul. As I said before, I am an atheist. I believe Jesus was an itinerant preacher much commonplace at the time. I don't believe he walked on water, turned water into wine, or rose from the dead.

Or, I can't be bothered? That may be an option?

Fairy tales? What the rock are you talking about? I'm talking about whether he existed or not. That is, a man who is now referred to as Jesus. Nothing to do with the bible or the stories within. Most historians believe such a man existed. Richard Dawkins doesn't deny his existence. I think maybe...

You agree that there is "absolutely no evidence that such a man existed"? No evidence at all? If you do, fair enough, but to say it's anything other than a minority view is wrong. His existence is not a debate for most serious historians.

Bollocks. You're in a minority here. Go join the chemtrails debate.

Completely different question to the one you asked then? JC existed. Did he die and come back again before levitating to heaven? Nah.