Search results

I really don't think that's true and I'm not arguing with you for the sake of it either. It's an attempt to nip something in the bud before it gets worse. Nothing more, nothing less. I totally agree about the leniency of some sentences, but as far I can see, it has absolutely nothing to do...

I agree, however they are not easily changed. This is definitely a case of nipping something in the bud before it gets worse, so mentioning sentences for other crimes is irrelvant in this case.

The difference between burglary cases and this specific case is that there are years of precendent around burglary cases. Social media is a relatively new phenomenon, so the judge is clearly setting a harsh precednet early. Clearly the right thing to do.