Search results

I was querying the statistical semantics. I'll think that it's OK to sensationalise the death/kidnapping of a kid to sell newspapers? I f***ing doubt it. After all, that's been my friggin point since the start of the thread.

Yeah it was a bit Daily Mailesque, sorry. :) Still, you don't tend to hear about the ongoing cases of kids going missing and not found each month, just MM. Annnyyywwwaaaayyyy, the pub is calling me.

I know. That wouldn't stop them hacking if the opportunity arose. I don't get your point. Does her disappearance make it any more important because she was under 10, not found within 72 hours and not suspected of being taken by family members to foreign countries/other parts of this country...

The Daily Nazi wouldn't be trying to move attention away from the hacking investigation would they?

It all sells papers. I don't get all the grief and worry about people you don't know. It probably depends how misanthropic you are.

Daily mail manipulating grief to sell papers again? What a surprise. Around 230,000 missing children reports are made in the UK every year, why do people focus on just one?