Search results

I'm sorry , I don't usually continue arguing with complete idiots but the point does NOT stand, it has been comprehensively trashed. You maintained the ppg was 'close' well it wasn't. Between promotion rivals 'close' would be a difference of about .02 i.e. one point, between us it's .13 And if...

Well, no it isn't a matter of opinion. You said originally that since Adkins took over your ppg ratio was as good as ours, and we've been able to demonstrate that it wasn't. The rest is conjecture on your part in an attempt to explain away the inconvenient truth represented by the league table.

Hypochondriac my deluded young friend. Look at that table my colleague Acker79 has produced. Look at the ppg ratio and say: "Oh, I was wrong, it was nothing to do with the start of the season, you've been better than us all season long." And if it makes you feel better we'll GIVE you the MK...

Ok, look it's not worth arguing about. Go and look at the league table when Adkins took over and see how many points you were behind us, and then look at it now. If the points gap between us is smaller now than it was then, then yes, your ppg record since that point in time is better than ours...

Well our start wasn't that good, we didn't hit the top spot until October. Early on we lost away at Sheffield Wednesday for crying out loud! All clubs have 'good' and 'bad' luck over the course of the season. You can't just say, as you appear to, that we had all the luck and you haven't. I...

Well I'll try and be sensible, but if you think that that those are the reasons why we've won the league then you have taken self-delusion up to whole new levels - no wonder your user name is 'hypochondriac', God knows what drugs you've been taking to come to that conclusion We've won this...